[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925132820.GA22767@amd>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:28:20 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Christoph Conrads <contact@...istoph-conrads.name>
Cc: Edward Cree <ec429@...tab.net>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.
Hi!
> > > > Your above argument that the Code of Conduct is problematic because of
> > > > who wrote it seems to contradict your statement that we shall judge by
> > > > code (or text) alone.
> > > I think there are important differences between code to be run by CPUs
> > > and a Code to be run by humans. And when the author goes on a victory
> > > lap on Twitter and declares the Code to be "a political document", is
> > > it any surprise I'm worried?
> >
> > Would you have link on that?
>
> The CoC is a political document:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20180924234027/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041465346656530432
>
> Possible victory lap 1:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20180921104730/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041441155874009093
>
> Possible victory lap 2:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20180920211406/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1042249983590838272
>
Thanks!
I thought you was referring to this... http://archive.is/6nhps
... which is somehow even more disturbing to me.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists