lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:41:55 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <>
To:     Thierry Reding <>
Cc:     Jonathan Hunter <>,
        Joerg Roedel <>,
        Rob Herring <>,
        Robin Murphy <>,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't detach devices from
 inactive domains

On 9/25/18 1:04 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:05:48PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 9/24/18 2:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:41:51AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> There could be unlimited number of allocated domains, but only one domain
>>>> can be active at a time. Hence devices must be detached only from the
>>>> active domain.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 8 +++++---
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> Do we have a mechanism of switching out different domains? I don't think
>>> we do, so I'm wondering if perhaps a better solution to this would be to
>>> just refuse to create more than one domain in the first place. That
>>> would also allow us to get rid of the global variable gart_handle.
>> That's what was done in v1, Robin Murphy suggested that it will be
>> better not to restrict allocation of unpopulated domains. It is
>> mentioned in the changelog, see comment to v2 changes.
> Okay, fine.

Thanks, taking as ACK.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists