[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afdd9f28-1c54-e936-e54e-0cc05526585c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:53:19 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com
Cc: argus.lin@...iatek.com, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, chenglin.xu@...iatek.com,
chen.zhong@...iatek.com, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: mediatek: use group of bits for pwrap capability
On 19/09/2018 09:25, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> Use group of bits for pwrap capability instead of
> elements of structure.
> This patch is preparing for adding mt8183 pwrap support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
I split this patch in two, one for the ordering of the SoCs and PMIC numbers and
the second one for adding the CAPs.
Please have a look if I didn't screw up :)
Applied to v4.19-next/soc
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists