lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54bbc3719576bf3365aea5992fe49cbc6b02e3b6.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:28:13 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
        Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/21] tpm1: reimplement tpm1_continue_selftest()
 using tpm_buf

On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 17:25 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 15:53 +0530, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > +
> > > +	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, &buf.data, PAGE_SIZE,
> > 
> > I think this needs to buf.data instead of &buf.data
> > 
> > Thanks & Regards,
> >       - Nayna
> 
> You are absolutely right. Thank you.

Had to backtrack what I was doing wrong last time because the commit
has my tested-by and noticed that I did not have this one applied. I
tested this now by doing the change that you suggested and seems to
work.

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ