linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/235] 4.18.10-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180925172507.nkjow2cgzjbdoaip@xps.therub.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:25:07 -0500
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/235] 4.18.10-stable review

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:07:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:49:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.10 release.
> > There are 235 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed Sep 26 11:30:01 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.18.10-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.18.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> -rc2 is out to resolve some reported problems:
>  	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.18.10-rc2.gz

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.18.10-rc2
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.18.y
git commit: a728cc9e2683aba1752aa9a0aacae4bbfc1066d2
git describe: v4.18.9-232-ga728cc9e2683
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.18-oe/build/v4.18.9-232-ga728cc9e2683

No regressions (compared to build v4.18.9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ran 16243 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c - arm64
- hi6220-hikey - arm64
- i386
- juno-r2 - arm64
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- x15 - arm
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* boot
* kselftest
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org