lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:52:57 -0400
From:   Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
To:     Tong Zhang <ztong@...edu>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        arve@...roid.com, tkjos@...roid.com, maco@...roid.com
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Wenbo Shen <shenwenbosmile@...il.com>
Subject: Re: leaking path in android binder: set_nice

On 09/25/2018 01:27 PM, Tong Zhang wrote:
> Kernel Version: 4.18.5
> 
> Problem Description:
> 
> When setting nice value, it is checked by LSM function security_task_setnice().
> see kernel/sched/core.c:3972 SYSCALL_DEFINE1(nice, int, increment)
> 
> We discovered a leaking path in android binder which allows using binder’s interface to change
> a process’s nice value. This path is leaked from being monitored by LSM.
> see drivers/android/binder.c:1107 binder_set_nice.

Not sure you want to invoke the LSM hook (or at least the same hook) 
when binder is performing priority inheritance.  There is a difference 
between a userspace process switching its own priority and the kernel 
binder driver performing it.  IIUC, the can_nice() check is more about 
honoring RLIMIT_NICE than anything else.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ