[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925190829.GC15464@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:08:29 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: define CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:41:19AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> bumping for review.
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 1:26 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since this file steamrolls KBUILD_CFLAGS, we have to redefine these
> > symbols.
Why do we have to redefine these symbols?
I don't see arch/x86/boot/ using asm_volatile_goto() and
CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO anywhere.
> > This will prevent warnings in source files in this directory
> > when Clang supports asm goto.
This statement I can't grok either. Maybe I'm slow or maybe I need more
background info...
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists