lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:45:56 +0200
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: fsl: qbman: qman_portal: defer probing when qman
 is not available

Hi,


On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:36 PM Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> If the qman driver (qman_ccsr) doesn't probe or fail to probe before
> qman_portal, qm_ccsr_start will be either NULL or a stale pointer to an
> unmapped page.
>
> This leads to a crash when probing  qman_portal as the init_pcfg function
> calls qman_liodn_fixup that tries to read qman registers.
>
> Assume that qman didn't probe when the pool mask is 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_portal.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_portal.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_portal.c
> index a120002b630e..4fc80d2c8feb 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_portal.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_portal.c
> @@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ static int qman_portal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         }
>
>         pcfg->pools = qm_get_pools_sdqcr();
> +       if (pcfg->pools == 0)
> +               return -EPROBE_DEFER;

This is quite late in the probe, after a bunch of resources have been claimed.

Note that the ioremaps above this are doing unwinds, and you'll end up
doing duplicate ioremaps if you come in and probe again.

You should probably unwind those allocations, or move them to devm_*
or do this check earlier in the function.


-Olof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ