[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <346cb95c-f9ce-f19b-30f3-75e9fb379290@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:12:28 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, od@...c.me,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/24] clocksource: Add a new timer-ingenic driver
On 25/09/2018 15:38, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>
> Le 24 sept. 2018 9:14 AM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> a écrit :
>>
>> On 24/09/2018 08:53, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 24 sept. 2018 07:58, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> On 24/09/2018 07:49, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 24 sept. 2018 07:35, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24/09/2018 07:24, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 24 sept. 2018 05:12, Daniel Lezcano
>>>>>>> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21/08/2018 19:16, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This driver handles the TCU (Timer Counter Unit) present on
>>>>>>>>> the Ingenic JZ47xx SoCs, and provides the kernel with a
>>>>>>>>> system timer, and optionally with a clocksource and a
>>>>>>>>> sched_clock.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It also provides clocks and interrupt handling to client
>>>>>>>>> drivers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you provide a much more complete description of the timer
>>>>>>>> in order to make my life easier for the review of this patch?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See patch [03/24], it adds a doc file that describes the
>>>>>>> hardware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, I went through but it is incomplete to understand what the
>>>>>> timer do. I will reverse-engineer the code but it would help if you
>>>>>> can give the gross approach. Why multiple channels ? mutexes and
>>>>>> completion ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Much of the complexity is because of the multi-purpose nature of the
>>>>> TCU channels. Each one can be used as timer/clocksource, or PWM.
>>>>>
>>>>> The driver starts by using channels 0 and 1 as system timer and
>>>>> clocksource, respectively, the other ones being unused for now. Then,
>>>>> *if* the PWM driver requests one of the channels in use by the
>>>>> timer/clocksource driver, say channel 0, the timer/clocksource driver
>>>>> will dynamically reassign the system timer to a free channel, from
>>>>> channel 0 to e.g. channel 2. Only in that case the completion/mutex
>>>>> are actually used.
>>>>
>>>> Why do you need to do this? Can't be the channels dedicated and reserved
>>>> for clocksource and clockevent?
>>>
>>> That's what I had in place (ingenic,timer-channel and ingenic,clocksource-channel DT properties), but Rob didn't want any linux-specific properties in the devicetree binding :(
>>
>> Isn't possible to specify the channel to use in the DT? like renesas16 ?
>
> That's what I did in V6 (and before), but Rob did not want me to add properties for Linux-specific concepts such as clocksource.
Hmm, I remember something like that, yes but I did a delete of the
previous version when you posted the v7. Can you give a pointer to its
answer ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists