lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180926063243.GA6587@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:32:43 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/235] 4.18.10-stable review

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:25:07PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:07:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:49:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.10 release.
> > > There are 235 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed Sep 26 11:30:01 UTC 2018.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.18.10-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.18.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > -rc2 is out to resolve some reported problems:
> >  	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.18.10-rc2.gz
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Great, thanks for testing and glad to see the problem get fixed.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ