lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY3YsXsJy0OwGYLuB+x32hbkAHum4w5KQTCGoi-OXt-QA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:00:33 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        yuanjiang.yu@...soc.com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] power: supply: core: Introduce one property to
 present the battery internal resistance

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:59 AM Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> wrote:

> Introduce one property to present the battery internal resistance for battery
> information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
>  - New patch in v2.

I'm a bit confused by the physics in this patch.

The internal resistance of a battery is not a constant in its life cycle,
this varies over the age of the battery, and the reason I thing is
chemical residuals accumulating on the anode and cathode inside
the battery and the energy storage medium aging. (Plus/minus my
ignorance about how batteries actually work.)

AFAIK the fact that the internal resistance varies is of high
importance for people developing algorithms of battery capacity
and longevity. Such that some (hardware) capacity monitors go
to great lengths to measure with high precision the current
internal resistance of the battery for their algorithms.

Sorry for making things more complex, but should it be named
"factory-internal-resistance-micro-ohms" or
"typical-internal-resistance-micro-ohms"?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ