linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: Make sysfs attributes writable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1h8idgj5y.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:08:09 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>, vinholikatti@...il.com,
        jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, stanislav.nijnikov@....com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bart.VanAssche@....com, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: Make sysfs attributes writable


Doug,

> I came across this patch and Evan's other one and noticed that they
> haven't been applied though a batch of other SCSI patches for 4.20
> were applied about a week ago.  Martin: is there something about these
> patches that needs to change before they can land?

I have simply been awaiting some sort of consensus on the various
competing approaches. Lots of patches posted with tiny incremental fixes
but very little discussion about the merits of one over the other.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering