[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180926093127.GO6278@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:31:27 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, nios2-dev@...ts.rocketboards.org,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/30] memblock: add align parameter to
memblock_alloc_node()
On Fri 14-09-18 15:10:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> With the align parameter memblock_alloc_node() can be used as drop in
> replacement for alloc_bootmem_pages_node() and __alloc_bootmem_node(),
> which is done in the following patches.
/me confused. Why do we need this patch at all? Maybe it should be
folded into the later patch you are refereing here?
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bootmem.h | 4 ++--
> mm/sparse.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bootmem.h b/include/linux/bootmem.h
> index 7d91f0f..3896af2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bootmem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bootmem.h
> @@ -157,9 +157,9 @@ static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_from_nopanic(
> }
>
> static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_node(
> - phys_addr_t size, int nid)
> + phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)
> {
> - return memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, 0, BOOTMEM_LOW_LIMIT,
> + return memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, BOOTMEM_LOW_LIMIT,
> BOOTMEM_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 04e97af..509828f 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static noinline struct mem_section __ref *sparse_index_alloc(int nid)
> if (slab_is_available())
> section = kzalloc_node(array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> else
> - section = memblock_alloc_node(array_size, nid);
> + section = memblock_alloc_node(array_size, 0, nid);
>
> return section;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists