linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Consolidate LPI_PENDBASE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:28:47 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Consolidate LPI_PENDBASE_SZ
 usage

On 24/09/18 11:33, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On 21/09/18 20:59, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> LPI_PENDING_SZ is always used in conjunction with a max(). Let's
>> factor this in the definition of the macro, and simplify the rest
>> of the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>> ---
>>    drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 12 ++++--------
>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> index c2df341ff6fa..ed6aab11e019 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static u32 lpi_id_bits;
>>     */
>>    #define LPI_NRBITS		lpi_id_bits
>>    #define LPI_PROPBASE_SZ		ALIGN(BIT(LPI_NRBITS), SZ_64K)
>> -#define LPI_PENDBASE_SZ		ALIGN(BIT(LPI_NRBITS) / 8, SZ_64K)
>> +#define LPI_PENDBASE_SZ		max_t(u32, SZ_64K, ALIGN(BIT(LPI_NRBITS) / 8, SZ_64K))
> 
> minor nit: The ALIGN() already aligns the given value up to the required
> alignment. So, if the LPI_NRBITS is guaranteed to be non-zero,
> we could simply drop the max_t().

Yeah, that's a brain fart on my part. I've fixed up.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...