[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180926131856.GD6920@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:18:56 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"dyoung@...hat.com" <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Fix kexec booting failure after SEV early boot
support
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:01:00PM +0000, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
> No concern from me. The original version of the patch did not cache the
> value, that was added based on the patch series feedback. So, if there
> is no concern about executing some extra CPUID/RDMSR instructions, then
> it would certainly simplify the code quite a bit.
Yeah, I think it was me who suggested to cache it but having simpler
code greatly outweighs the minute caching win.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists