linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: Add mmc_force_detect_change_begin /

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9028dcb-c217-4efc-60a7-d0a2c1804a08@exceet.de>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:44:44 +0200
From:   Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...eet.de>
To:     ulf.hansson@...aro.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
        quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        baolin.wang@...aro.org, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        icenowy@...c.xyz, wens@...e.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: Add mmc_force_detect_change_begin / _end
 functions

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:01:00PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> > I'd like to know if any progress has been made on that problem 
(I may
> >> > have missed patches).
> >> > Had you had the time to look at the issue?
> >>
> >> I have looked at the issue, but not manage to cook some patches 
for it.
> >>
> >> However, it's on my top of my TODO list for mmc. No promises, but
> >> perhaps and hopefully I manage to get something posted during the
> >> coming release cycle.

I would be interested in a ESP8089 driver in mainline and that's why I 
want to pick up this discussion.

What is the current status of the "mmc_reprobe_device" implementation, 
that Hans was explaining and Ulf wanted to provide some months ago?

BTW, I am not on any of the mailing lists involved, so I tried to 
recreate the proper mail headers manually for the reply to the correct 
thread.

Thanks,
Frieder

> >>
> >
> > Cool! If you ever need some testing, I'd be glad to test your patches
> > (even if they are in a draft/RFC state).
> >
> > Also, when you send patches, I'd appreciate being Cc'ed so that I can
> > put my Tested-by :) Thanks!
>
> Absolutely! I appreciate it.