[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b5c4322-291a-c11b-a2ee-6256ba7441df@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:32:48 -0700
From:   Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@...ux.intel.com>,
        openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        James Feist <james.feist@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH i2c-next 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: Add
 'idle-wait-timeout-ms' setting
On 9/26/2018 9:27 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> Should I use timeout in struct i2c_adapter instead just like i2c-mpc
>> does?
> 
> I would accept that.
> 
Okay, I will submit a new patch set. Thanks!
Jae
Powered by blists - more mailing lists