linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: x86: hyperv: optimize kvm_hv_flush_tlb() for vp_index == vcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180926170259.29796-7-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:02:58 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: x86: hyperv: optimize kvm_hv_flush_tlb() for vp_index == vcpu_idx case

VP inedx almost always matches VCPU and when it does it's faster to walk
the sparse set instead of all vcpus.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index eeb12eacd525..cc0535a078f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1277,32 +1277,37 @@ int kvm_hv_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata, bool host)
 		return kvm_hv_get_msr(vcpu, msr, pdata, host);
 }
 
-static __always_inline int get_sparse_bank_no(u64 valid_bank_mask, int bank_no)
+static __always_inline bool hv_vcpu_in_sparse_set(struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu,
+						  u64 sparse_banks[],
+						  u64 valid_bank_mask)
 {
-	int i = 0, j;
+	int bank = hv_vcpu->vp_index / 64, sbank;
 
-	if (!(valid_bank_mask & BIT_ULL(bank_no)))
-		return -1;
+	if (bank >= 64)
+		return false;
 
-	for (j = 0; j < bank_no; j++)
-		if (valid_bank_mask & BIT_ULL(j))
-			i++;
+	if (!(valid_bank_mask & BIT_ULL(bank)))
+		return false;
 
-	return i;
+	/* Sparse bank number equals to the number of set bits before it */
+	sbank = bitmap_weight((unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask, bank);
+
+	return !!(sparse_banks[sbank] & BIT_ULL(hv_vcpu->vp_index % 64));
 }
 
 static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *current_vcpu, u64 ingpa,
 			    u16 rep_cnt, bool ex)
 {
 	struct kvm *kvm = current_vcpu->kvm;
-	struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_current = &current_vcpu->arch.hyperv;
+	struct kvm_hv *hv = &kvm->arch.hyperv;
+	struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = &current_vcpu->arch.hyperv;
 	struct hv_tlb_flush_ex flush_ex;
 	struct hv_tlb_flush flush;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	unsigned long vcpu_bitmap[BITS_TO_LONGS(KVM_MAX_VCPUS)] = {0};
-	u64 valid_bank_mask = 0;
+	u64 valid_bank_mask;
 	u64 sparse_banks[64];
-	int sparse_banks_len, i;
+	int sparse_banks_len, i, bank, sbank;
 	bool all_cpus;
 
 	if (!ex) {
@@ -1312,6 +1317,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *current_vcpu, u64 ingpa,
 		trace_kvm_hv_flush_tlb(flush.processor_mask,
 				       flush.address_space, flush.flags);
 
+		valid_bank_mask = BIT_ULL(0);
 		sparse_banks[0] = flush.processor_mask;
 		all_cpus = flush.flags & HV_FLUSH_ALL_PROCESSORS;
 	} else {
@@ -1344,52 +1350,54 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *current_vcpu, u64 ingpa,
 			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
 	}
 
-	cpumask_clear(&hv_current->tlb_lush);
+	/*
+	 * vcpu->arch.cr3 may not be up-to-date for running vCPUs so we can't
+	 * analyze it here, flush TLB regardless of the specified address space.
+	 */
+	cpumask_clear(&hv_vcpu->tlb_lush);
 
 	if (all_cpus) {
 		kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(kvm,
 				    KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP,
-				    NULL, &hv_current->tlb_lush);
+				    NULL, &hv_vcpu->tlb_lush);
 		goto ret_success;
 	}
 
-	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-		struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv = &vcpu->arch.hyperv;
-		int bank = hv->vp_index / 64, sbank = 0;
-
-		/* Banks >64 can't be represented */
-		if (bank >= 64)
-			continue;
-
-		/* Non-ex hypercalls can only address first 64 vCPUs */
-		if (!ex && bank)
-			continue;
-
-		if (ex) {
-			/*
-			 * Check is the bank of this vCPU is in sparse
-			 * set and get the sparse bank number.
-			 */
-			sbank = get_sparse_bank_no(valid_bank_mask, bank);
-
-			if (sbank < 0)
-				continue;
+	if (atomic_read(&hv->num_mismatched_vp_indexes)) {
+		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+			if (hv_vcpu_in_sparse_set(&vcpu->arch.hyperv,
+						  sparse_banks,
+						  valid_bank_mask))
+				__set_bit(i, vcpu_bitmap);
 		}
+		goto flush_request;
+	}
 
-		if (!(sparse_banks[sbank] & BIT_ULL(hv->vp_index % 64)))
-			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * vcpu->arch.cr3 may not be up-to-date for running vCPUs so we
-		 * can't analyze it here, flush TLB regardless of the specified
-		 * address space.
-		 */
-		__set_bit(i, vcpu_bitmap);
+	/*
+	 * num_mismatched_vp_indexes is zero so every vcpu has
+	 * vp_index == vcpu_idx.
+	 */
+	sbank = 0;
+	for_each_set_bit(bank, (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask,
+			 BITS_PER_LONG) {
+		for_each_set_bit(i,
+				 (unsigned long *)&sparse_banks[sbank],
+				 BITS_PER_LONG) {
+			u32 vp_index = bank * 64 + i;
+
+			/* A non-existent vCPU was specified */
+			if (vp_index >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
+				return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
+
+			__set_bit(vp_index, vcpu_bitmap);
+		}
+		sbank++;
 	}
 
+flush_request:
 	kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(kvm,
 				    KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP,
-				    vcpu_bitmap, &hv_current->tlb_lush);
+				    vcpu_bitmap, &hv_vcpu->tlb_lush);
 
 ret_success:
 	/* We always do full TLB flush, set rep_done = rep_cnt. */
-- 
2.17.1