[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180926234740.GN4222@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:47:40 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [0/5] rcu doc updates
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:26 AM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> > These patches are documentation updates for the rcu_dynticks rolling into
> > rcu_data and also the updates to the fact that there's a single rcu_state now.
> > Its based on your rcu/dev branch.
> >
> > Next I'm thinking of tackling 'RCU Callback Handling' and further digging into
> > the dyntick handling and then dig into other documents outside of
> > Data-Structure that need updates. But let me know any suggestions.
> > Thanks!
>
> Apologies that my scripts missed the 'PATCH' prefix. Hopefully that's
> Ok for this time, but let me know if you'd like me to resend them!
> Thanks!
I will let it go this time. ;-)
Queued, thank you very much! I will push them out when I get to a
reliable network connection.
I made a few adjustments to wording, so please double-check. You
should be able to just diff against your original patches.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists