| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <88325716f2a6447a9e12312674be317b@SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:22:50 +0000
From: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
To: Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
"benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific
dma memory pool
Hi Wendy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:17 PM
> To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>; Ohad Ben-Cohen
> <ohad@...ery.com>; linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Arnaud POULIQUEN
> <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>; benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org; Suman Anna
> <s-anna@...com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with
> specific dma memory pool
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:16 AM Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch creates a dedicated vdev subdevice for each vdev declared
> > in firmware resource table and associates carveout named "vdev%dbuffer"
> > (with %d vdev index in resource table) if any as dma coherent memory
> pool.
> >
> > Then vdev subdevice is used as parent for virtio device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 35
> +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 1 +
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 42
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index 4edc6f0..adcc66e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include <linux/idr.h>
> > #include <linux/elf.h>
> > #include <linux/crc32.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > #include <linux/virtio_ids.h>
> > #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> > #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> > @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static void rproc_disable_iommu(struct rproc
> *rproc)
> > iommu_domain_free(domain);
> > }
> >
> > -static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
> > +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
> > {
> > /*
> > * Return physical address according to virtual address location
> > @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void
> *cpu_addr)
> > WARN_ON(!virt_addr_valid(cpu_addr));
> > return virt_to_phys(cpu_addr);
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa);
> >
> > /**
> > * rproc_da_to_va() - lookup the kernel virtual address for a remoteproc
> address
> > @@ -423,6 +425,20 @@ static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct
> rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev
> > + *
> > + * @dev: the subdevice's dev
> > + */
> > +static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev);
> > +
> > + of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> > +
> > + kfree(rvdev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
> > * @rproc: the remote processor
> > * @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
> > @@ -455,6 +471,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
> > int i, ret;
> > + char name[16];
> >
> > /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
> > if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct
> fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
> > @@ -488,6 +505,18 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> > rvdev->rproc = rproc;
> > rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
> >
> > + /* Initialise vdev subdevice */
> > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
> > + rvdev->dev.parent = rproc->dev.parent;
> > + rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release;
> > + dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev-
> >dev.parent), name);
> > + dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev);
> > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&rvdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> I tried the latest kernel, this function will not set the DMA coherent mask as
> dma_supported() of the &rvdev->dev will return false.
> As this is a device created at run time, should it be force to support DMA?
> should it directly set the dma_coherent_mask?
Thanks for pointing me this issue. I tested on top of 4.18-rc1 few months ago...
Could you please give me kernel version on which you are testing the series?
Is you platform 32bit or 64bit ?
I'll rebase and check on my side.
Regards,
Loic
>
> > +
> > + ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_rvdev;
> > +
> > /* parse the vrings */
> > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
> > ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i);
> > @@ -518,7 +547,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> > for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> > rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
> > free_rvdev:
> > - kfree(rvdev);
> > + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -536,7 +565,7 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> >
> > rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
> > list_del(&rvdev->node);
> > - kfree(rvdev);
> > + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index f6cad24..bfeacfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct dentry *rproc_create_trace_file(const char
> *name, struct rproc *rproc,
> > int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
> >
> > void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
> > +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
> > int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
> >
> > int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > index de21f62..9ee63c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
> > * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > */
> >
> > +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > #include <linux/virtio.h>
> > #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> > @@ -315,10 +317,48 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device
> *dev)
> > int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
> > {
> > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> > - struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev;
> > struct virtio_device *vdev = &rvdev->vdev;
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
> > + mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev-
> >index);
> > + if (mem) {
> > + phys_addr_t pa;
> > +
> > + if (mem->of_resm_idx != -1) {
> > + struct device_node *np = rproc->dev.parent->of_node;
> > +
> > + /* Associate reserved memory to vdev device */
> > + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np,
> > + mem->of_resm_idx);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Can't associate reserved memory\n");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + if (mem->va) {
> > + dev_warn(dev, "vdev %d buffer already mapped\n",
> > + rvdev->index);
> > + pa = rproc_va_to_pa(mem->va);
> > + } else {
> > + /* Use dma address as carveout no memmapped yet */
> > + pa = (phys_addr_t)mem->dma;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Associate vdev buffer memory pool to vdev subdev */
> > + ret = dmam_declare_coherent_memory(dev, pa,
> > + mem->da,
> > + mem->len,
> > + DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to associate buffer\n");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > vdev->id.device = id,
> > vdev->config = &rproc_virtio_config_ops,
> > vdev->dev.parent = dev;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index 6b3a234..2921dd2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
> > struct kref refcount;
> >
> > struct rproc_subdev subdev;
> > + struct device dev;
> >
> > unsigned int id;
> > struct list_head node;
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc"
> in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists