[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927071330.1fa3cfdd@coco.lan>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 07:13:30 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Jian Xu Zheng <jian.xu.zheng@...el.com>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] media: intel-ipu3: allow the media graph to be used
even if a subdev fails
Em Thu, 27 Sep 2018 11:52:35 +0200
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> escreveu:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On 09/04/2018 01:30 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series allows the ipu3-cio2 driver to properly expose a subset of the
> > media graph even if some drivers for the pending subdevices fail to probe.
> >
> > Currently the driver exposes a non-functional graph since the pad links are
> > created and the subdev dev nodes are registered in the v4l2 async .complete
> > callback. Instead, these operations should be done in the .bound callback.
> >
> > Patch #1 just adds a v4l2_device_register_subdev_node() function to allow
> > registering a single device node for a subdev of a v4l2 device.
> >
> > Patch #2 moves the logic of the ipu3-cio2 .complete callback to the .bound
> > callback. The .complete callback is just removed since is empy after that.
>
> Sorry, I missed this series until you pointed to it on irc just now :-)
>
> I have discussed this topic before with Sakari and Laurent. My main problem
> with this is how an application can discover that not everything is online?
> And which parts are offline?
Via the media controller? It should be possible for an application to see
if a videonode is missing using it.
> Perhaps a car with 10 cameras can function with 9, but not with 8. How would
> userspace know?
I guess this is not the only case where someone submitted a patch for
a driver that would keep working if some device node registration fails.
It could be just déjà vu, but I have a vague sensation that I merged something
similar to it in the past on another driver, but I can't remember any details.
>
> I completely agree that we need to support these advanced scenarios (including
> what happens when a camera suddenly fails), but it is the userspace aspects
> for which I would like to see an RFC first before you can do these things.
Dynamic runtime fails should likely rise some signal. Perhaps a sort of
media controller event?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Javier
> >
> >
> > Javier Martinez Canillas (2):
> > [media] v4l: allow to register dev nodes for individual v4l2 subdevs
> > media: intel-ipu3: create pad links and register subdev nodes at bound
> > time
> >
> > drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c | 66 ++++++-----------
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c | 90 ++++++++++++++----------
> > include/media/v4l2-device.h | 10 +++
> > 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> >
>
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists