[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927134922.GA8281@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:49:23 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dma-direct: refine dma_direct_alloc zone selection
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:45:15AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I'm not sure this is entirely right.
>
> Let's say the mask is 30 bits. You will return GFP_DMA32, which will
> fail if you allocate something above 1G (which is legit for
> ZONE_DMA32).
And then we will try GFP_DMA further down in the function:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA) &&
dev->coherent_dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(32) &&
!(gfp & GFP_DMA)) {
gfp = (gfp & ~GFP_DMA32) | GFP_DMA;
goto again;
}
This is and old optimization from x86, because chances are high that
GFP_DMA32 will give you suitable memory for the infamous 31-bit
dma mask devices (at least at boot time) and thus we don't have
to deplete the tiny ZONE_DMA pool.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists