linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] x86/entry: remove _TIF_ALLWORK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180927142140.kxjvjuuvbbqea6zw@linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:21:40 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] x86/entry: remove _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK

On 2018-09-12 15:33:44 [+0200], To linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> There is no user of _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK since commit 21d375b6b34ff
> ("x86/entry/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 fast path").
> Remove unused define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>

Is it okay for that one to be merged as-is or should I repost it without
the RFC?

Sebastian