[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927153028.GD10566@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:30:28 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dma-direct: refine dma_direct_alloc zone selection
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:30:20PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> +static gfp_t __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(struct device *dev, u64
>> dma_mask,
>> + u64 *phys_mask)
>> +{
>> + if (force_dma_unencrypted())
>> + *phys_mask = __dma_to_phys(dev, dma_mask);
>> + else
>> + *phys_mask = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_mask);
>
> Maybe make phys_to_dma_direct() take u64 instead of phys_addr_t so we can
> reuse it here?
This is a dma_to_phys and not a phys_to_dma.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists