linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/12] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMty3ZABx9Fod5W_T7JciZEsn7jGvuM-LsBFATdA=hQ2CVwELw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Sep 2018 21:50:34 +0530
From:   Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix VBP size calculation

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 8:51 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:18:44PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > According to horizontal and vertical timings are defined
> > per the diagram from include/drm/drm_modes.h
> >
> > Back porch = [hv]total - [hv]sync_end
> >
> > So, update SUN6I_DSI_BASIC_SIZE0_VBP calculation as
> > mode->vtotal - mode->vsync_end
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > index 1c7e42015645..599284971ab6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > @@ -526,8 +526,8 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_setup_timings(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
> >       regmap_write(dsi->regs, SUN6I_DSI_BASIC_SIZE0_REG,
> >                    SUN6I_DSI_BASIC_SIZE0_VSA(mode->vsync_end -
> >                                              mode->vsync_start) |
> > -                  SUN6I_DSI_BASIC_SIZE0_VBP(mode->vsync_start -
> > -                                            mode->vdisplay));
> > +                  SUN6I_DSI_BASIC_SIZE0_VBP(mode->vtotal -
> > +                                            mode->vsync_end));
>
> Is it purely theoretical, or did you find some source that back that?

VSA is done as per that, sync_end - sync start would give sync time.
VBP also done in BPI-M64-bsp[1] which results back porch existing code
results fron porch.

[1] https://github.com/BPI-SINOVOIP/BPI-M64-bsp/blob/master/linux-sunxi/drivers/video/sunxi/disp2/disp/de/lowlevel_sun50iw1/de_dsi.c#L955