linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] ti_am335x_tsc: Enable wakeup capability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f61848d8-57f6-14c0-eb74-cab488ceda50@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 11:42:41 +0530
From:   Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ti_am335x_tsc: Enable wakeup capability

Hi Lee,

On Wednesday 25 July 2018 10:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
[...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vignesh R (5):
>>>>>>>   mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't mark TSCADC MFD as wakeup capable
>>>>>>>   Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark TSC device as wakeup source
>>>>>>>   mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Keep ADC interface on if child is wakeup
>>>>>>>     capable
>>>>>>>   iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: Disable ADC during suspend unconditionally
>>>>>>>   Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark IRQ as wakeup capable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c           | 12 ++++--------
>>>>>>>  drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>>>  drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c            | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>>>>>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gentle ping... Could you review/pick this series? MFD amd IIO bits are
>>>>>> already ACKed
>>>>>
>>>>> MFD patches are reviewed "for my own reference" meaning that we
>>>>> haven't yet agreed on a merge plan yet.
>>>>
>>>> I think this series makes sense to be pushed through a single tree as
>>>> opposed to being spread between 3, even if it could technically be
>>>> possible. It looks like Jonathan is fine with going it through either
>>>> his or some other tree, I am fine with it going through MFD.
>>>
>>> I'm happy either way.
>>>
>> Thanks Dmitry, Jonathan and Lee Jones!
>>
>> Could this be applied to one of the trees now? MFD perhaps?
> 
> It'll be applied, when it's applied. ;)

I see that this series was not picked up for v4.19. Could you consider
this series for v4.20? Patches apply cleanly against linux-next.


-- 
Regards
Vignesh