[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180928075654.GA20768@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:57:11 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com, tiwai@...e.de,
brijesh.singh@....com, dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com,
jroedel@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 RESEND 2/4] kexec: allocate unencrypted control pages
for kdump in case SME is enabled
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:52:21AM +0800, lijiang wrote:
> There are two functions that are usually called in pairs, they are:
> arch_kexec_post_alloc_pages() and arch_kexec_pre_free_pages().
>
> One marks the pages as decrypted, another one marks the pages as encrypted.
>
> But for the crash control pages, no need to call arch_kexec_pre_free_pages(),
> there are three reasons:
> 1. Crash pages are reserved in memblock, these pages are only used by kdump,
> no other people uses these pages;
>
> 2. Whenever crash pages are allocated, these pages are always marked as
> decrypted(when SME is active);
>
> 3. If we plan to call the arch_kexe_pre_free_pages(), we have to store these
> pages to somewhere, which will have more code changes.
I don't think any of that answers the question *why* control pages do
not need to be marked encrypted again. And I think the reason is simple:
because you don't really need to, because once the crash kernel is done,
you reboot the box.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists