linux-kernel - Re: Contributors can not just rescind the license (Legal Opinion)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180928104236.2ruw2ukriys2gms3@angband.pl>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:42:36 +0200
From:   Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
To:     "www.Advocati.org" <advocati@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contributors can not just rescind the license (Legal Opinion)

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:31:32AM +0200, www.Advocati.org wrote:
> CONTRIBUTORS CAN NOT JUST RESCIND THE LICENSE
> THEY GRANTED UNDER GPLv2. IT IS *COPYLEFTED*

> A letter from 17.09.2018 by @observerofaffairs
> titled 'GPL version 2 is a bare license. Recind. (Regarding (future)
> Code of Conduct Bannings)'
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/17/1174,

> repeated by another letter from 20.09.2018 by @unconditionedwitness
> titled 'Re: A Plea to Unfuck our Codes of Conduct'
> https://lulz.com/linux-devs-threaten-killswitch-coc-controversy-1252/

You're responding to trolling by our dear MikeeUSA, whom most of us long
since learned to recognize and ignore.  There are better uses for your time
than responding to a notorious cartooney.

He's as nasty a troll as CoralineAda, and about as harmful to the community.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 10 people enter a bar:
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ • 1 who understands binary,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ • 1 who doesn't,
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ • and E who prefer to write it as hex.