[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3YkR7Qr=XnqvQTOn=v34rCBfW1+dqU5xpV4ysar+C4yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:10:32 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] ia64: uapi header and system call table file generation
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:16 PM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
> +#include <asm/syscall_table.h>
> .org sys_call_table + 8*NR_syscalls // guard against failures to increase NR_syscalls
> +#undef __SYSCALL
This part looks odd: according to the comment, this should only guard against
the table getting out of sync. However, with the script, that will never happen.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists