[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3YkR7Qr=XnqvQTOn=v34rCBfW1+dqU5xpV4ysar+C4yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:10:32 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] ia64: uapi header and system call table file generation
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:16 PM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org> wrote:
> +#include <asm/syscall_table.h>
>         .org sys_call_table + 8*NR_syscalls     // guard against failures to increase NR_syscalls
> +#undef __SYSCALL
This part looks odd: according to the comment, this should only guard against
the table getting out of sync. However, with the script, that will never happen.
      Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
