[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180928135532.GA1581@brain-police>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:55:32 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: joro@...tes.org, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, guohanjun@...wei.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
john.garry@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for non-strict mode
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:26:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 28/09/18 13:19, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:10:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > > > index f10c852479fc..db402e8b068b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > > > @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
> > > > struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */
> > > > struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops;
> > > > + bool non_strict;
> > > > enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage;
> > > > union {
> > > > @@ -1407,6 +1408,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie)
> > > > cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid;
> > > > }
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with
> > > > + * PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible
> > > > + * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod()
> > > > + * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007.
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > Good, so you can ignore my comment on the previous patch :)
> >
> > Well, I suppose that comment in io-pgtable *could* have explicitly noted
> > that same-CPU order is dealt with elsewhere - feel free to fix it up if you
> > think it would be a helpful reminder for the future.
>
> I think I'll move it into the documentation for the new attribute, so that
> any driver authors wanting to enable lazy invalidation know that they need
> to provide this guarantee in their full TLB invalidation callback.
Hmm, so I started doing this but then realised we already required this
behaviour for tlb_add_flush() afaict. That would mean that mainline
currently has a bug for arm-smmu.c, because we use the _relaxed I/O
accessors in there and there's no DSB after clearing the PTE on unmap().
Am I missing something?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists