[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8Pej+hKV7=RbwUkE4PtXjqHewRMfE7mYJLu+xnS+HFQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 17:51:05 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 05/23] zinc: import Andy Polyakov's ChaCha20
ARM and ARM64 implementations
On 28 September 2018 at 17:49, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 25 September 2018 at 16:56, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>> These NEON and non-NEON implementations come from Andy Polyakov's
>> implementation, and are included here in raw form without modification,
>> so that subsequent commits that fix these up for the kernel can see how
>> it has changed. This awkward commit splitting has been requested for the
>> ARM[64] implementations in particular.
>>
>> While this is CRYPTOGAMS code, the originating code for this happens to
>> be the same as OpenSSL's commit 87cc649f30aaf69b351701875b9dac07c29ce8a2
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
>> Based-on-code-from: Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>
>> Cc: Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
>> Cc: Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>
> As I mentioned before, I'd prefer this to be based on the original .pl
> but if I am the only one objecting to this, I guess I can live with
> it.
>
Note that I am getting bounces from LAKML because the patch is too big.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists