linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kbuild: Some fixdep tweaks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 11:21:41 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Kbuild: Some fixdep tweaks

Hi Rasmus,


2018年9月27日(木) 3:58 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>:
>
> On 15 August 2018 at 16:27, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> > These patches eliminate two (albeit tiny and shortlived) processes
> > from the cmd_and_fixdep rule, i.e. from every TU being
> > compiled. Whether the diffstat below is worth it I'll leave to Kbuild
> > maintainers to decide.
>
> Ping.


Sorry for delay.
As far as I tested, the performance improvement was not noticeable level.

This patch set actually sits on the fence.
I tend to choose not-apply when I cannot make up my mind.


If you have something more to convince me, please let me know.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada