[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153816066933.119890.2976485722156069351@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 11:51:09 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clk: qcom: Add lpass clock controller driver for SDM845
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-09-18 03:25:38)
> @@ -3469,6 +3495,8 @@ enum {
> [GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK_SRC] = &gcc_qspi_core_clk_src.clkr,
> [GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK] = &gcc_qspi_core_clk.clkr,
> [GCC_QSPI_CNOC_PERIPH_AHB_CLK] = &gcc_qspi_cnoc_periph_ahb_clk.clkr,
> + [GCC_LPASS_Q6_AXI_CLK] = NULL,
> + [GCC_LPASS_SWAY_CLK] = NULL,
> };
>
> static const struct qcom_reset_map gcc_sdm845_resets[] = {
> @@ -3583,6 +3611,13 @@ static int gcc_sdm845_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,lpass-protected")) {
Shouldn't this be negated? So that we only add the clks when lpass isn't
protected?
> + gcc_sdm845_clocks[GCC_LPASS_Q6_AXI_CLK] =
> + &gcc_lpass_q6_axi_clk.clkr;
> + gcc_sdm845_clocks[GCC_LPASS_SWAY_CLK] =
> + &gcc_lpass_sway_clk.clkr;
> + }
> +
> return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &gcc_sdm845_desc, regmap);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists