[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809282224090.1432@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:26:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
fthain@...egraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Set USER_DS for the futex_detect_cmpxchg() test
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> > There may be a much nicer solution. Unless I missed something, only
> > mips and xtensa even have the possibility of cmpxchg being missing.
> > We could just make those arches supply a futex-detecting helper.
>
> In case of xtensa availability of cmpxchg is known at build time.
That makes it even simpler. Could you provide a patch which selects
CONFIG_HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG for the right set of CPUs please?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists