linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/64] 4.14.73-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180928044617.GC20540@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:46:17 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/64] 4.14.73-stable review

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:45:30PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.73 release.
> >> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Responses should be made by Sat Sep 29 09:02:21 UTC 2018.
> >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > My kvm guest had this:
> >
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > [    8.585076] RIP: drm_debugfs_init+0x183/0x370 [drm] RSP: ffff88002b1bf5e8
> > [    8.585404] ---[ end trace 62728db3ac408aba ]---
> >
> > And I had to revert 7e58fe2a97bc ("drm/atomic: Use
> > drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset() for debugfs creation") to make it work.
> > I am looking more into why it failed.
> 
> update:
> 
> Backporting 57078338b2e4 ("drm: fix drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset on non
> modesetting drivers.") fixed the issue. But 7e58fe2a97bc ("drm/atomic:
> Use drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset() for debugfs creation") changed the
> functionality of the check. If this has to be applied, it will also
> need an additional patch to keep the check same as linus tree.
> 
> But looking at the other mails now, and you have already dropped the patch.

Yes, already dropped :)