linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 04/23] zinc: ChaCha20 x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:56:01 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
        Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 04/23] zinc: ChaCha20 x86_64 implementation

On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 04:01:53AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I was wondering about the ordering of these, actually. I've seen s-o-b
> on top and s-o-b on bottom of the cc list in lots of commits and
> haven't yet divined the One True Position.

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

section 12, first sentence.

The SOB chain needs to clearly express the path of the patch from
author(s) to the upstream kernel.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.