linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] userfaultfd: selftest: generalize read and poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 29 Sep 2018 13:31:39 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] userfaultfd: selftest: generalize read and poll

On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 04:43:10PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> We do very similar things in read and poll modes, but we're copying the
> codes around.  Share the codes properly on reading the message and
> handling the page fault to make the code cleaner.  Meanwhile this solves
> previous mismatch of behaviors between the two modes on that the old
> code:
> 
> - did not check EAGAIN case in read() mode
> - ignored BOUNCE_VERIFY check in read() mode
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 76 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> index 2a84adaf8cf8..f79706f13ce7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -449,6 +449,42 @@ static int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset)
>  	return __copy_page(ufd, offset, false);
>  }
> 
> +static int uffd_read_msg(int ufd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
> +{
> +	int ret = read(uffd, msg, sizeof(*msg));
> +
> +	if (ret != sizeof(*msg)) {
> +		if (ret < 0)

I'd appreciate curly brace here

> +			if (errno == EAGAIN)
> +				return 1;
> +			else
> +				perror("blocking read error"), exit(1);
> +		else

and here

> +				fprintf(stderr, "short read\n"), exit(1);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return 1 if page fault handled by us; otherwise 0 */
> +static int uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg)
> +{
> +	unsigned long offset;
> +
> +	if (msg->event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT)
> +		fprintf(stderr, "unexpected msg event %u\n",
> +			msg->event), exit(1);
> +
> +	if (bounces & BOUNCE_VERIFY &&
> +	    msg->arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
> +		fprintf(stderr, "unexpected write fault\n"), exit(1);
> +
> +	offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg->arg.pagefault.address - area_dst;
> +	offset &= ~(page_size-1);
> +
> +	return copy_page(uffd, offset);
> +}
> +
>  static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg)
>  {
>  	unsigned long cpu = (unsigned long) arg;
> @@ -456,7 +492,6 @@ static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg)
>  	struct uffd_msg msg;
>  	struct uffdio_register uffd_reg;
>  	int ret;
> -	unsigned long offset;
>  	char tmp_chr;
>  	unsigned long userfaults = 0;
> 
> @@ -480,25 +515,15 @@ static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg)
>  		if (!(pollfd[0].revents & POLLIN))
>  			fprintf(stderr, "pollfd[0].revents %d\n",
>  				pollfd[0].revents), exit(1);
> -		ret = read(uffd, &msg, sizeof(msg));
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			if (errno == EAGAIN)
> -				continue;
> -			perror("nonblocking read error"), exit(1);
> -		}
> +		if (uffd_read_msg(uffd, &msg))
> +			continue;
>  		switch (msg.event) {
>  		default:
>  			fprintf(stderr, "unexpected msg event %u\n",
>  				msg.event), exit(1);
>  			break;
>  		case UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT:
> -			if (msg.arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
> -				fprintf(stderr, "unexpected write fault\n"), exit(1);
> -			offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg.arg.pagefault.address -
> -				area_dst;
> -			offset &= ~(page_size-1);
> -			if (copy_page(uffd, offset))
> -				userfaults++;
> +			userfaults += uffd_handle_page_fault(&msg);
>  			break;
>  		case UFFD_EVENT_FORK:
>  			close(uffd);
> @@ -526,8 +551,6 @@ static void *uffd_read_thread(void *arg)
>  {
>  	unsigned long *this_cpu_userfaults;
>  	struct uffd_msg msg;
> -	unsigned long offset;
> -	int ret;
> 
>  	this_cpu_userfaults = (unsigned long *) arg;
>  	*this_cpu_userfaults = 0;
> @@ -536,24 +559,9 @@ static void *uffd_read_thread(void *arg)
>  	/* from here cancellation is ok */
> 
>  	for (;;) {
> -		ret = read(uffd, &msg, sizeof(msg));
> -		if (ret != sizeof(msg)) {
> -			if (ret < 0)
> -				perror("blocking read error"), exit(1);
> -			else
> -				fprintf(stderr, "short read\n"), exit(1);
> -		}
> -		if (msg.event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT)
> -			fprintf(stderr, "unexpected msg event %u\n",
> -				msg.event), exit(1);
> -		if (bounces & BOUNCE_VERIFY &&
> -		    msg.arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
> -			fprintf(stderr, "unexpected write fault\n"), exit(1);
> -		offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg.arg.pagefault.address -
> -			 area_dst;
> -		offset &= ~(page_size-1);
> -		if (copy_page(uffd, offset))
> -			(*this_cpu_userfaults)++;
> +		if (uffd_read_msg(uffd, &msg))
> +			continue;
> +		(*this_cpu_userfaults) += uffd_handle_page_fault(&msg);
>  	}
>  	return (void *)NULL;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.