[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180929014926.227002-1-jannh@google.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:49:26 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com, jannh@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] apparmor: don't try to replace stale label in ptraceme check
begin_current_label_crit_section() must run in sleepable context because
when label_is_stale() is true, aa_replace_current_label() runs, which uses
prepare_creds(), which can sleep.
Until now, the ptraceme access check (which runs with tasklist_lock held)
violated this rule.
Fixes: b2d09ae449ced ("apparmor: move ptrace checks to using labels")
Reported-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
---
security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index 8c7f46a6a8dc..0f56431b4b2f 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -131,11 +131,11 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
struct aa_label *tracer, *tracee;
int error;
- tracee = begin_current_label_crit_section();
+ tracee = __begin_current_label_crit_section();
tracer = aa_get_task_label(parent);
error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee, AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
aa_put_label(tracer);
- end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
+ __end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
return error;
}
--
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists