[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1538257387.972713658@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:43:07 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 021/131] seccomp: Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE
3.16.59-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
commit b849a812f7eb92e96d1c8239b06581b2cfd8b275 upstream.
Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE in seccomp() because seccomp does not allow to
widen restrictions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static inline void spec_mitigate(struct
int state = arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(task, which);
if (state > 0 && (state & PR_SPEC_PRCTL))
- arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_DISABLE);
+ arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE);
}
static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(unsigned long seccomp_mode)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists