[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180929221301.z7dytm4whpcbip6a@linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 00:13:02 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
kbuild-all@...org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
Tim Sander <tim@...eglstein.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] watchdog, rt: prevent deferral of watchdogd wakeup
On 2018-09-29 08:38:55 [+0200], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.19-rc5 next-20180928]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> >
>
> It's against the RT tree, so it won't work against next or upstream. I
> think it would be good to have a machine parseable tag to describe which
> tree/branch/commit patches are applicable to. If that tag is missing, the
> bot can assume it's against upstream/next.
I asked the testing team to ignore patches or test against the RT tree
if the patch is tagged [PATCH RT]. I think it worked since I haven't
seen those mails.
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists