lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_3v6Y1Bs1+WQKFfdNmAFdBN6VJTDiCG1ApNVM2AWt4vjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Sep 2018 08:23:32 +0200
From:   Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To:     timur@...nel.org
Cc:     jhugo@...eaurora.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: Show correct direction from the beginning

Hi Timur

In fact  gpiochip_init_valid_mask is called some lines after in the
same function. We could reorder the function. Would that work for you?

The driver breaking is upstream? Is it possible to access the hardware?

Thanks

[Sorry for the two html mails in a row, I did not try to work with my
phone before :) ]
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:23 PM Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > Nack.  Causes a XPU violation to the GPIO config registers.
>
> That doesn't surprise me at all.
>
> I believe that the problem is that gpiochip_line_is_valid() is being
> called before gpiochip_irqchip_init_valid_mask() is called, which
> means that gpiochip_line_is_valid() always returns true.



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ