linux-kernel - [STABLE PATCH] slub: make ->cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1538303301-61784-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Date:   Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:28:21 +0800
From:   zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To:     <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <cl@...ux.com>, <penberg@...nel.org>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <mhocko@...nel.org>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        <andrea@...nel.org>, <kirill@...temov.name>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [STABLE PATCH] slub: make ->cpu_partial unsigned int

From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit e5d9998f3e09359b372a037a6ac55ba235d95d57 ]

        /*
         * cpu_partial determined the maximum number of objects
         * kept in the per cpu partial lists of a processor.
         */

Can't be negative.

I hit a real issue that it will result in a large number of memory leak.
Becuase Freeing slabs are in interrupt context. So it can trigger this issue.
put_cpu_partial can be interrupted more than once.
due to a union struct of lru and pobjects in struct page, when other core handles
page->lru list, for eaxmple, remove_partial in freeing slab code flow, It will
result in pobjects being a negative value(0xdead0000). Therefore, a large number
of slabs will be added to per_cpu partial list.

I had posted the issue to community before. The detailed issue description is as follows.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2870979.html

After applying the patch, The issue is fixed. So the patch is a effective bugfix.
It should go into stable.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180305200730.15812-15-adobriyan@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.4.x
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
---
 include/linux/slub_def.h | 3 ++-
 mm/slub.c                | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
index 3388511..9b681f2 100644
--- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
+++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ struct kmem_cache {
 	int size;		/* The size of an object including meta data */
 	int object_size;	/* The size of an object without meta data */
 	int offset;		/* Free pointer offset. */
-	int cpu_partial;	/* Number of per cpu partial objects to keep around */
+	/* Number of per cpu partial objects to keep around */
+	unsigned int cpu_partial;
 	struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo;
 
 	/* Allocation and freeing of slabs */
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 2284c43..c33b0e1 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
 {
 	struct page *page, *page2;
 	void *object = NULL;
-	int available = 0;
+	unsigned int available = 0;
 	int objects;
 
 	/*
@@ -4674,10 +4674,10 @@ static ssize_t cpu_partial_show(struct kmem_cache *s, char *buf)
 static ssize_t cpu_partial_store(struct kmem_cache *s, const char *buf,
 				 size_t length)
 {
-	unsigned long objects;
+	unsigned int objects;
 	int err;
 
-	err = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &objects);
+	err = kstrtouint(buf, 10, &objects);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	if (objects && !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s))
-- 
1.7.12.4