[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180930120909.30469-1-lkcl@lkcl.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:09:09 +0100
From: lkcl@...l.net
To: martin@...htvoll.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Re: Linux 4.19-rc4 released, an apology, and a maintainership note
> That written: Quite some of the rude mails that contained swearwords I
> read from you have been about code, not persons. I think this is an
> important distinction. I do not have much of an issue with swearing at
> code :), especially when it is in some humorous way.
absolutely, and this is one thing that a lot of people are, sadly,
trained pretty much from birth to be incapable of understanding:
namely the difference between criticism of the PERSON and criticism
of the ACTION.
(1) "YOU are bad! GO STAND IN THE NAUGHTY CORNER!"
(2) "That was a BAD thing to do!"
(3) "That hurt my feelings that you did that"
the first is the way that poorly-trained parents and kindergarten
teachers talk to children.
the second is... only marginally better, but it's a start
the third is how UNICEF trains teachers to treat children as human beings.
> Code quality indeed is important.
> As are human interactions.
absolutely. it's not about the code, it's always, *always* about people.
we just happen to be writing code, but ultimately we are doing so in the
service of other PEOPLE.
l.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists