[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180930173930.kyciz5vll23vpjw2@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:39:30 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: __nf_register_net_hook jump label splat
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> this is something new I'm triggering with rc5 + tip/master while rc4 +
> tip/master is fine. Any ideas?
No clue. I don't see any netfilter changes between rc4 & rc5.
I just tried to set up a bridge on rc5 with call-iptables=1
and I see no such splat.
> If I had to guess, it looks like this thing:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
> static_key_slow_inc(&nf_hooks_needed[pf][reg->hooknum]);
> #endif
Strange, these static keys have been there for years.
Any chance you could send your .config or bisect this?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists