linux-kernel - Why the FSF collects copyright assignments.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0eed2e2037a36216ecb42394784cc373@redchan.it>
Date:   Mon, 01 Oct 2018 04:05:20 +0000
From:   freedomfromruin@...chan.it
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rms@....org, bruce@...ens.com, esr@...rsus.com,
        moglen@...umbia.edu, bkuhn@...onservancy.org, editor@....net
Subject: Why the FSF collects copyright assignments.

The paramount reason Eben Moglen has the FSF accepting contributions 
only with copyright assignment is because the grantor of a license that 
is a gratuity (no consideration (read: usually money) given) can remove 
the permission regarding the use of his property at his pleasure.

(Regardless of the story that was promulgated for the public ("only to 
have standing to sue under copyright, since the GPL is a bare license 
and does not give rise to contract damages") - which was and is a 
half-truth only (Yes: you do need to own the rights to a work to sue 
under copyright, Yes the GPL is a bare license, No: that's not the whole 
reason why one would want the author to no-longer hold the copyright))