linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] namei: implement various scoping AT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:14:27 +1000
From:   Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, dev@...ncontainers.org,
        containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] namei: implement various scoping AT_* flags

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:47:23PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2018-10-01, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> > > I've added some selftests for this, but it's not clear to me whether
> > > they should live here or in xfstests (as far as I can tell there are no
> > > other VFS tests in selftests, while there are some tests that look like
> > > generic VFS tests in xfstests). If you'd prefer them to be included in
> > > xfstests, let me know.
> > 
> > xfstests, please. That way the new functionality will get immediate
> > coverage by all the main filesystem development and distro QA
> > teams....
> 
> Sure, will do. Do you want me to submit them in parallel --

That's usually the way we do things, but we don't tend to commit the
fstests changes until the thing it is testing has landed upstream.

> and what is
> the correct ML to submit changes to xfstests?

fstests@...r.kernel.org

> Sorry for the silly questions. :P

You're going to have many more of them when you start moving the
tests across to fstests :P

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com