[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <044ce172-f0fb-4a78-e624-797b5bfe002c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:25:10 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] perf: Per PMU access controls (paranoid setting)
Hello,
On 28.09.2018 21:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
<SNIP>
> Start with something like Documentation/admin-guide/perf-security.rst or
> whatever name fits better and add a proper documentation for the existing
> knob. With the infrastructure for fine grained access control add the
> general explanation for fine grained access control. With each PMU which
> opt's in for the knob, add a section with guidance about scope and risk for
> this particular one.
Sounds like a plan. Thanks!
BR,
Alexey
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists