linux-kernel - SFConservancy misleads in "update" explaining GPLv2.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3a72a88d59387d15bfe1efa1edbf04cc@redchan.it>
Date:   Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:11:56 +0000
From:   freedomfromruin@...chan.it
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dng@...ts.dyne.org,
        debian-user@...ts.debian.org
Cc:     rms@....org, bruce@...ens.com, esr@...rsus.com,
        moglen@...umbia.edu, bkuhn@...onservancy.org, editor@....net
Subject: SFConservancy misleads in "update" explaining GPLv2.

Section 4 is not operative against the grantor of the license, and makes 
no claim to be so.

It is speaking only of licensees and what might be described as 
sub-licensees.

Section 0 confirms that "You" refers to licensees.

Section 4 simply states that if a licensee loses his license, that does 
not cause the sub-licensee to lose his license in-turn.