[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d75416af-2cc4-595a-48dc-381d14785191@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 10:58:40 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
longman@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen: fix race in xen_qlock_wait()
On 01/10/2018 10:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 01.10.18 at 09:16, <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>> In the following situation a vcpu waiting for a lock might not be
>> woken up from xen_poll_irq():
>>
>> CPU 1: CPU 2: CPU 3:
>> takes a spinlock
>> tries to get lock
>> -> xen_qlock_wait()
>> -> xen_clear_irq_pending()
>
> Doesn't the last line above ...
>
>> frees the lock
>> -> xen_qlock_kick(cpu2)
>
> ... need to be below here?
You are right, of course!
Thanks for noticing.
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists