[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181001091853.GA29682@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 10:18:54 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 04:19:07PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:02 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:52:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> > > convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
> > >
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Cheers, I can queue this up for 4.20. Let me know if you'd rather take it
> > along with the name pointer removal instead.
>
> I assumed you were going to take this since I didn't say otherwise,
> but looks like it is not in linux-next. Please take thru your tree.
Sorry, slipped through the cracks. I'll get it queued asap for the merge
window.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists